In support of prisoners and prison justice activism in Canada
Tories hype tough on crime agenda during election

Youth targeted with longer sentences
Less house arrest mean thousands more could head to jail

October 2008
Stark Raven Media Collective

The Tories are filling their election campaign with tough on crime announcements. And they are facing criticism from community groups, academics and the legal community who charge there is no evidence to support these proposed changes.

One of the Tories’ plans targets youth. Stephen Harper says that he would ensure that people as young as 14 who are convicted of manslaughter, murder or aggravated assault automatically face longer sentences. He also says that the Tories will no longer have young people’s identities protected by publication bans.

Judge Merlin Nunn, who led an inquiry into the youth justice system in Nova Scotia, says longer prison terms for anyone, including youth, will not make the public safer. Criminologist Ross Hastings, says that this is more of a politics of crime response rather than it is a reasoned, evidence-based response. In addition, some legal experts are saying that these sentences for youth are unconstitutional.

In another announcement,Stephen Harper committed to replacing house arrest with prison sentences for more than 30 charges, including property crimes such as break and enter, car theft and robbery.

This will lead to thousands of more people going to jail and to an expensive expansion of the prison system.

Aboriginal justice workers say this will lead to more aboriginal people being sent to jail.

Jonathan Rudin, a lawyer with Aboriginal Legal Services in Toronto, says conditional sentencing and other options other than incarceration, including restorative justice, are more successful in the long run in helping people make change their lives, which ultimately makes Canada safer.

About three per cent of Canada's population is aboriginal, but inside the prison more than 20 per cent of the prison population is aboriginal.

When questioned about the lack of evidence to show that his proposals will work to reduce crime Harper sloughs off his critics.

He spouts several populist buzz lines about victims rights, the need to restore balance to the system and about how the “foundation of our criminal justice system should not be the welfare of criminals, but rather, the protection of honest, hard-working citizens and their families.”

Harper has yet to provide evidence as to how these proposals will reduce crime.

When faced with criticisms about how these proposals will affect aboriginal people, Harper responded with how he thinks the justice system needs to be colour blind.

In response to Harper, critics point to the U.S., arguing that if the tough on crime approach worked, then the U.S. would be the safest place in the world.

Studies in the U.S. have shown that the states with the toughest prison sentences had the least success in driving down crime rates in the 1990s.

Those who work with affected communities and who have done the research, argue that all the resources spent policing, charging and locking people up could be better spent. They say that the money could be put in housing, addiction services and community initiatives to build stronger communities and hence prevent crime long before it happens.

Source articles:
cbc.ca
cbc.ca
nationalpost.com
canada.com
toronto.ctv.ca
eastottawa.ca

Further info on prisonjustice.ca:
More on the tough on crime agenda